+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: throttle body mod.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Austin Tx.
    Posts
    13,138
    i was browsing some sites and saw this modification i could do to my throttle body http://www.sshotrods.com/fullsize/4.3/tb/

    i wanted to hear some input on it. anyone think there would be any drawbacks in doing this? would i really gain increase in hp by doing this? im assuming my gas mileage would shoot all the way down if i punch it.

    thanks
    1951 3100
    1984 C10

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Humble/Houston TX
    Posts
    2,586
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(duckysbht &#064; Feb 21 2006, 10&#58;52 PM) [snapback]45084[/snapback]</div>
    i was browsing some sites and saw this modification i could do to my throttle body http://www.sshotrods.com/fullsize/4.3/tb/

    i wanted to hear some input on it. anyone think there would be any drawbacks in doing this? would i really gain increase in hp by doing this? im assuming my gas mileage would shoot all the way down if i punch it.

    thanks
    [/b]
    seems like the engineers wouldnt put that thing there if there wasnt a reason for it...its not like they said "hmmm lets just add a useless attacment to the blade to hinder the outrageous power of the v6 motor."

    kinda like the MAF screen. alot of people remove it and claim good power increases. i remove mine and get tuning problems. they wouldnt add a screen in there for shits and giggles just like the lil moon thingy on your throttle blade. but ya never know. do some before and after tests and let us know.

    old mod list: H/C/I/N/E/G 408
    new mod list: 5.3, gears/posi, mufler and tune : (

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Austin Tx.
    Posts
    13,138
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TXsilverado &#064; Feb 22 2006, 02&#58;17 PM) [snapback]45115[/snapback]</div>
    seems like the engineers wouldnt put that thing there if there wasnt a reason for it...its not like they said "hmmm lets just add a useless attacment to the blade to hinder the outrageous power of the v6 motor."

    kinda like the MAF screen. alot of people remove it and claim good power increases. i remove mine and get tuning problems. they wouldnt add a screen in there for shits and giggles just like the lil moon thingy on your throttle blade. but ya never know. do some before and after tests and let us know.
    [/b]
    well actually the more i read it, the more it seemed i didnt feel like tampering with my throttle body, knowing me id probably take off a very very important piece.
    1951 3100
    1984 C10

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    621
    I replaced my TB on my 4.3 with a modded one. I think that hootus is there for emissions purposes & I think I read that it&#39;s supposed to help low speed torque or something but I can&#39;t swear to that. I didn&#39;t notice any ill effects after I replaced it. Actually my throttle would hang a bit before I replaced it(I think because of that hootus). It was quite a bit more responsive off idle afterwards but my 1/8 mile times didn&#39;t improve much at all.

    I&#39;ll sell you mine if you want it. It has been polished,hootus removed, & throttle shafts halved all for improved flow. PM me if your interested and I&#39;ll send you some pics.

    [1/8 mile E.T. - 8.23 @ 82.86 mph w/1.82 60&#39;] &#39;98swb,4/6drop,20"RozziDeeps on 275/40ToyoProxes &#39;98LS1/4L60E,TRCheaTR cam,Ported TB,Billet MAF ends,MSD8.5 superconductor wires,S&P midlengths,&#33;EGR,&#33;cats,2 1/2" true duals w/X-pipe,Dynomax Ultraflows,TCI 3000,billet servo,TCI deep aluminum pan,3.73&#39;s w/Auburn posi; Eclipse CD, Rockford 6 1/2&#39;s, Memphis 12&#39;s, Punch 200 ix, Punch 500x

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts