383LT1 Formula Dynapak

[DBRODS]

Here is a video of this setup on the local Dynapak putting down 701rwhp. And also a clip of it running 10.3 @ 135 which backs up the numbers. Car weight is 3620lbs.

http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/f/15/GE1VJNn24t4

http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/u/22/k3zZmk4ickM

[George C]

curious as to the numbers....two local camaros make less HP and trap same or slightly higher

one being a 02ss trapped 135 on 580rwhp thru a unlocked 80e and 9"
other being a 86iroc trapped 141 thru a Th400 and 10 bolt dynoing 630rwhp

02ss tips scales slightly over 4k
86iroc tips scales at 36xx

[DBRODS]

Its insane huh?

Even if you enter the weight and Hp it is almost perfect for these ET calculators..
http://www.race-cars.net/calculators/et_calculator.html

Being a 6speed the Et is off by .2-3 tenths and the MPH is perfect...

[GraniteBlueNNBS]

very nice car seen it in person many time around town

[George C]

yea i dont believe that calculator much, some of the numbers punched in work others not so well. Local guy who runs the LSX series this year traps 129 on a 100 shot on a LQ4 with a polluter,stock 243 heads, GMT900, 1 3/4 headers, 80e,513 gears in 3600lb raceweight elcamino. says combo is 600 rwhp which isnt possible


its odd how one vehicle can trap that mph at that power level and others with less power trap the same or visa versa

whats those vehicles dyno on a mustang?

[kerrige]

Wow quik your kinda hating on the dynapak numbers lately.... You have some sick rides yourself and for the most part I like you respect you and what you have to say but dang man lately seems like you really seem to b downing those ppl testing on dynapakks

[George C]

numbers dont match...when local cars are going faster or same speed with less power and little more weight...whats that tell you? not a fan of a dyno that you remove you wheels as they always seem to give false numbers
Jon is a good dude but his posting of a dynapak were bashed instantly for being off, not just this site or PT.net but other sites. if you view other sites they frown on dynapaks. Most use the mustang as general.

700rwhp in a Fbody usually nets you 140 trap speeds, near 600 nets you mid 130s

Wow quik your kinda hating on the dynapak numbers lately.... You have some sick rides yourself and for the most part I like you respect you and what you have to say but dang man lately seems like you really seem to b downing those ppl testing on dynapakks

[DBRODS]

Heres more videos of the same car a few years ago on a different setup. Dyno was done on a dynojet. It made 624rwhp and trapped 129mph. This also matches what the calculators say. The calculators are based of physics, its takes xxxhp to run xxxmph in a 1/4mile.

http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/u/5/VbmkC4PNoFw

http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/u/1/8VQkrPZaeLQ

Both of these dynos match exactly what the math does.. plain and simple..

[chevrolet all the way]

Heres more videos of the same car a few years ago on a different setup. Dyno was done on a dynojet. It made 624rwhp and trapped 129mph. This also matches what the calculators say. The calculators are based of physics, its takes xxxhp to run xxxmph in a 1/4mile.

http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/u/5/VbmkC4PNoFw

http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/u/1/8VQkrPZaeLQ

Both of these dynos match exactly what the math does.. plain and simple..

there is a little more to it than that...

[tanz45]

None of those vids showed any kind of ''actual'' dyno data. Unless they yelled it during the video, cause i can't use sound at work. But even then they could shout any number they wanted. So where are those numbers from? Just asking.