So i can spend 600 on a set of 241 with ferra stanless 202 160 valves with prc duals that are freshly rebuild with a mild .010 mill or i can spend spend 600 and get my 862's ported, polished, milled and have my 918's installed. Which would make more sense on my 5.3 not gonna turbo it might spray it later on cam is gonan be the 224/230 581/588 114lsa that is sitting on my shelf..
Slim
Get the 241's with bigger valves and sell your stockers for some beer money.
2002 Tahoe 4.8 - soon to be turbo'd - SOLD
1989 Mustang - LX Vert - 351W-TT - 2inches of dust covering it
2012 Raptor - 497rwhp at 10psi
If you aint breaking - you aint going fast enough
I guess another question is will the 202 / 160 valves have a problem with my small bore 5.3?????
You are going to need new tires soon... the sidewalls are worn out from all you're tire kicking the past monthsJust get the 5.3's touched up and put them back on. Best bang for the buck
30' Ford Model A Tudor Sedan - Custom chassis - Big bore LS2 - twin B76's - Glide - 9" w/ 3.07 gears - 30" DR tire - 2k lbs cruiser
well i got the cam smart azz
241's are junk. Stock sets of 241's go for $100 or less here, and that's complete not bare.
For $600 you're basically paying $340 for the PRC's and then paying for the mill job, which I still think 241's are junk. Just my $0.02 though.
the 202 valve is useless to those 241s. seems as a SBC guy worked on those heads.
2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
412 Motorsports
it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
