+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 49

Thread: Crank pulley bolt

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    12,078
    I can almost garuntee it's not on all the way.

    My 1/2" impact is rated at 600ft/lbs in reverse and can break off 5/8" (16mm) dually wheel studs but will not seat one of these because of the nature of the design (hammering action instead of steady push).

    "Hitting it with a breaker bar" is using force on the bolt and bolt head against the crank to try to pull it on. That is much different than having a stud threaded all the way into the crankshaft and a nut (applying force to the stud threads) forcing only the pulley on.

    Then again, whatever works.

    No disrespect Greg, you have some sweet-ass homemade tools that are proven to work better than the over-priced and delicate K-M tools issued to GM dealers! Many of you have good cheater methods too....

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    impact gun is only as good as the air source.......so blow little harder and ti will go on
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  3. #33
    My impact is rated for 1000lbs, lol were talking about the same thing on diff threads.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    12,078
    The gun ratings are not the same as steady twisting force ratings due to the hammering nature (they're higher).

  5. #35
    so what is mine really.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mesquite
    Posts
    8,176
    I've done a bunch of cam swaps and always ALWAYS used an impact. Then my last one came loose.

    DO IT PER GM SPECS. THERE ARE SPECS FOR A REASON.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    997
    Never had a problem with the ones I've R&R'd. Heated the pulley with a propane torch just enough to seat it on the crank, then used the old bolt to seat it completely. I've replaced the bolt on one cam swap, but not the second time. I'm reusing the bolt on my low-mile, refreshed motor, but yes, GM "recommends" replacement. Sorry, I don't do "everything" GM recommends. LOL

    GM "thinks" LS based motors should last 200K before major maintenance. I had an ALL STOCK Yukon 5.3L that said otherwise.
    Test-n-Tune (Nov 23, 2008) - 13.65s @ 98mph

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    12,078
    I know several people with more than 200K on theirs.

    The reason it's supposed to be replaced is that the torque spec stretches the bolt to a point just before failure. The the bolt is loosened, it will not have the same properties when tightened the second time. Same principle for the head bolts.

  9. #39
    Wait head bolt are torque to yield also.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    12,078
    Yep.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts