+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: LQ4 or LQ9

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    4

    LQ4 or LQ9

    Which one LQ4 or LQ9? What year motor should I be looking for my 2000 Silverado. How long would this swap take roughly?DSC03047.jpg
    Last edited by xrevx1; 06-16-2010 at 08:14 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, TX Area
    Posts
    1,741
    I would go with the LQ9, unless you are going FI then go with the LQ4. Go with a 2001 or newer I think. Someone else can give you a better answer than me as to what year to choose. The swap should just take a weekend, mechanical ability and friends, if you already have a v8.
    "ALisSa1 Silverado"
    1990 Chevrolet RCSB 2002 Chevrolet Camaro LS1/4L60E
    Scrimpin Ain't Easy
    ( . Y . )


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, TX Area
    Posts
    1,741
    "ALisSa1 Silverado"
    1990 Chevrolet RCSB 2002 Chevrolet Camaro LS1/4L60E
    Scrimpin Ain't Easy
    ( . Y . )


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, TX Area
    Posts
    1,741
    One more, I'm sure there are more out there.
    http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/mecha...9-lq4-lq9.html
    "ALisSa1 Silverado"
    1990 Chevrolet RCSB 2002 Chevrolet Camaro LS1/4L60E
    Scrimpin Ain't Easy
    ( . Y . )


  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    4
    Thanks that is what i was looking for.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    85
    I wondered the same thing. I'm getting the lq9 and putting my S/C on it. People say get the lq4, but is there really a down side to the lq9 with FI?
    07 nnbs ecsb 5.3, full bolt on, Blown. 6.0 swap going in now, and maybe 100 shot. To be continued...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by TvsQuez View Post
    I wondered the same thing. I'm getting the lq9 and putting my S/C on it. People say get the lq4, but is there really a down side to the lq9 with FI?
    The LQ9 has too much compression to run a lot of boost.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, TX Area
    Posts
    1,741
    In one of the links someones post said the LQ9 is good for 4-5 lbs. Don't know for sure.
    "ALisSa1 Silverado"
    1990 Chevrolet RCSB 2002 Chevrolet Camaro LS1/4L60E
    Scrimpin Ain't Easy
    ( . Y . )


  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    85
    Yeah, I was reading that one. Just didn't see anything in detail on any of the links posted of "why"?
    07 nnbs ecsb 5.3, full bolt on, Blown. 6.0 swap going in now, and maybe 100 shot. To be continued...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    85
    i'll only be running 8-9 lbs of boost. It's just that roush s/c. it's not much, and 317 heads. So I should be aroun 9:5:1? Anyone?
    07 nnbs ecsb 5.3, full bolt on, Blown. 6.0 swap going in now, and maybe 100 shot. To be continued...

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts