+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: cams too big for stock manifolds?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    hot & windy
    Posts
    1,117

    cams too big for stock manifolds?

    so, as i've mentioned a few times earlier, i'm wanting to get a cam sometime before i leave for OTS in june. after talking to a few of y'all & some guys at Comp Cams, Texas Speed, & Thunder Racing, i think i've narrowed it down to a couple choices.

    the specs for my truck are:
    1999 NBS Sierra RCSB 4x4
    2001 5.3 LM7, 1999 NV3500 trans
    3.73 gears, 265/75-16 tires (changing to 285/75-16 when these wear out)
    airaid CAI (filter & tube), Mellowtone muffler (similar to flowdisaster 50HD) - 3" in/dual 2.25" out the back
    possible 243/799 heads later on down the road, but that still remains very undecided


    i'm basically just looking for a bigger curve, mainly low & mid gains - 90% of my driving is under 2500rpm. any top end gains are just for kicks & giggles and showing off

    now, on to the point of my post...
    i know that some LT headers are a great addition anyway, but i don't know if i want to do them or the cam first (leaning more towards the cam), so i'm wondering if any of these will be fine to run with factory manifolds for a while. also which would y'all recommend based on real-world usage (feel free to add your own suggestions as well)

    comp 212/218 522/529 114*
    tsp 214/218 522/529 112*
    tr 214/230 601/575 117*

    they said the cheaTR works great with factory manifolds, but from a little reading, i'm leaning more towards either the comp or tsp.

    thanks in advance for y'all's input!
    00 FRC - just top end, exhaust, and a hot-air intake
    99 Sierra - 5.3 / 5spd
    ↓ click the pic for the build ↓

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Austin Tx.
    Posts
    13,138
    If you keep your eyes out on pt.net, people sell longtubes + ORY for good deals.
    1951 3100
    1984 C10

  3. #3
    casey23 Guest
    in a N/A setup.. long tubes and a Y pipe help out alot... dont waste money with shortys

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Honeywood, Ontario
    Posts
    6,994
    If I was doing the same thing as you I'd be doing the one from TR, the lower duration with the massive lift (in comparison to the other 2) would work great on the bottom end. If you want any hint of a nicer idle, I seriously doubt it will be any different than stock.
    2006 Silverado
    Little Black Bitch

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    chicago, il
    Posts
    1,334
    Comp LSR part#54-455-11

    215/223 .604/.610 112

    Now that's a cam!
    GET OUT OF HERE WITH THAT RICER MATH!

    Quote Originally Posted by pl4yboy View Post
    If you aren't living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    doing a cam before exhaust is like chasing your tail. youll see more gains tossing headers on right now then you would a cam with manifolds. When you install the cam once you have headers the cam will then shine
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    hot & windy
    Posts
    1,117
    thanks for the responses. i was thinking the LTs would probably end up being the first one that needed to be done, but i figured i'd ask.


    about that LSR cam: how's the DD-ability of it? i'm trying to not completely kill my mileage which is why i was looking at the slightly-bigger-than-stock cams instead of something like a TR224. besides... this ain't a race truck
    00 FRC - just top end, exhaust, and a hot-air intake
    99 Sierra - 5.3 / 5spd
    ↓ click the pic for the build ↓

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    chicago, il
    Posts
    1,334
    Very streetable cam, would def. have a little lope to it. Naturally, will decrease gas mileage.
    GET OUT OF HERE WITH THAT RICER MATH!

    Quote Originally Posted by pl4yboy View Post
    If you aren't living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    532
    tr220 or old man cam. or a 212/218 .595/.590 114. has more hp than the high lift 212/218 and has more aggressive lobe. good with stock verter
    04 Silverado Z-71 Extended Cab

    Magnaflow, 10.4 TV 50 wires, tr-55ix, Synthetics, HID's, JL audio, 33.5", leveling kit, tuned, CAI, vette servo, cam, valve job, pacesetter. 9.3@77.5 and 14.5@93.4

    06 2wd

    custom cam, tune, 3.73's, servo, HID's, 10.4mm wires, long-tubes, CAI, magnaflow, 2.5" shackles, Circle-D 3200, UD, JL Audio 4.1, Alpine 5ch

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Augusta, Ks
    Posts
    3,246
    Headers first for sure.
    2000 Silverado ECSB- 5.3 CAI, Pacesetter LTs, ORY- Pipe, Magnaflow XL, E-fan, Ported T/B , Nelson Tuned, Built 4l60e, Circle D Stall, 3.42s G80, 2-4 Drop, Hertz Highs, Rockford 501s

    2004 Buell XB12s

    Quote Originally Posted by LamboDoNoMo View Post
    "Never give up, NEVER BACK DOWN!!!"

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts