+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 4.8 Crank in a 6.0 Block

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Oak Forest, Illinois
    Posts
    276

    4.8 Crank in a 6.0 Block

    I don't have any plans for this combo, but I am just looking for opinions. What about a 4.8 crank in a 6.0 block for an everyday driver twin turbo RCSB 2WD. You would have a 4 inch bore to let the heads breathe and a 3.270 inch stroke for a little better fuel economy. After all 99% of the time you are not in boost. I know it would be down a little on torque while out of boost, but the turbos would take care of that while in boost.

  2. #2
    wondertruck Guest
    the smaller stroke wouldn't equate to any kind of better fuel economy. The lsx heads flow plenty well to not NEED a 4" bore however they do work damn good with one. Really it wouldn't be worth the lost power since you can build one with a 3.622" stroke, get the same gas mileage, turn the same rpm, and make more power.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mansfield, Texas, USA
    Posts
    2,462

    Thumbs up

    It'd be one high RPM bastard.
    The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions. - Confucius

    "He who asks of life nothing but the improvement of his own nature, is less liable than anyone else to miss and waste life."- Henri Frederic Amiel

    '01 Chev Z71 LT - '85 BMW 745i TURBO - '88 BMW 750iL - '88 Ford F150 XLT Lariat - '79 MB 240D - '79 MB 280S Euro
    '80 MB 380SE-5.0 Euro - '85 MB 300SD - '87 MB 300SDL - 1990 MB 300SEL - '91 MB 300SE - '91 MB 560SEL

    Let's face it, the red hair... makes 'em wet.


  4. #4
    wondertruck Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Hit Man X View Post
    It'd be one high RPM bastard.

    how do you figure it would spin any higher than a 3.622" crank motor? A motor with the small stroke would make its power at higher RPM, but would not be capable of more rpm than a 3.622" crank motor. Now, make it a lighter, stronger shorter crank and yes, you will effectively raise the RPM capability of the motor/crank, however when comparing two stock cranks, one being shorter than the other it brings no new or higher RPM into the equation, just less power.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mansfield, Texas, USA
    Posts
    2,462

    Thumbs up

    Has to rev to make its power.
    The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions. - Confucius

    "He who asks of life nothing but the improvement of his own nature, is less liable than anyone else to miss and waste life."- Henri Frederic Amiel

    '01 Chev Z71 LT - '85 BMW 745i TURBO - '88 BMW 750iL - '88 Ford F150 XLT Lariat - '79 MB 240D - '79 MB 280S Euro
    '80 MB 380SE-5.0 Euro - '85 MB 300SD - '87 MB 300SDL - 1990 MB 300SEL - '91 MB 300SE - '91 MB 560SEL

    Let's face it, the red hair... makes 'em wet.


  6. #6
    wondertruck Guest
    every motor has to rev to make its power. why rev more than necessary to make power, less power at that.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts