+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: 6.0L vs LS1

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wylie, TX
    Posts
    525
    Ok, I am still a ways from being able to do a swap. But, I am wondering what the pros and cons would be between a 6.0L vs the LS1. and how bad would the gas mileage be with the 6.0L

    Thanks,
    Randy
    RChevy.48
    2001 Silverado RCSB 4.8L
    Current Mods
    Flowmaster Exhaust
    LT1 Fans
    vette cam sitting in garage

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    L.A., California
    Posts
    346
    Umm...I think I read some guy getting 12MPG with the 6.0.
    '01 Sierra 4.8 SCSB
    4.10, Eaton posi, Nelson tune, 160 t-stat, K&N Intake, Magnaflow catback, Vig 3200, Transgo+billets, 100 NX wet shot

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mansfield, Texas, USA
    Posts
    2,462
    6.0 is iron and has a 4" bore
    LS1 is alu and has a 3.9" bore

    Want to lose weight? Go Alu. More bore? Go the 6.0

    Gas milage is going to be the same with either. The 6.0 is a truck motor too.
    The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions. - Confucius

    "He who asks of life nothing but the improvement of his own nature, is less liable than anyone else to miss and waste life."- Henri Frederic Amiel

    '01 Chev Z71 LT - '85 BMW 745i TURBO - '88 BMW 750iL - '88 Ford F150 XLT Lariat - '79 MB 240D - '79 MB 280S Euro
    '80 MB 380SE-5.0 Euro - '85 MB 300SD - '87 MB 300SDL - 1990 MB 300SEL - '91 MB 300SE - '91 MB 560SEL

    Let's face it, the red hair... makes 'em wet.


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wylie, TX
    Posts
    525
    I thought Allen had stated that LS1 was getting about 20mpg and Chingon states that the 6.0 is getting aprox 12mpg. Thats a huge difference !
    RChevy.48
    2001 Silverado RCSB 4.8L
    Current Mods
    Flowmaster Exhaust
    LT1 Fans
    vette cam sitting in garage

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    193
    I'm betting that mpg is going to be greatly affected by weight. I get 13mpg now in the city and that's constantly WOT I think a 5.7 would be the same pulling this much weight around.
    '02 1500HD, 6.0L, magnacharger, 2000stall, custom magnaflow with electric cutout, E-fans, Nelson custom tune, Auburn LSD.
    '79 L82 vette, Summit 355, Dart Pro1 heads, Comp 274 cam, Holley TBI, Built TH350 with 2500stall
    '93 Blazer, full size 2dr 4x4, new project.....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    L.A., California
    Posts
    346
    Does anyone know if the LS2 aluminum 6.0 that's going in the '05 Corvette will swap right in?
    400HP/400Ft.Lbs. TQ

    The Z06 will have 525HP I think and the "Blue Devil" will have 625HP...IF it makes it to production
    '01 Sierra 4.8 SCSB
    4.10, Eaton posi, Nelson tune, 160 t-stat, K&N Intake, Magnaflow catback, Vig 3200, Transgo+billets, 100 NX wet shot

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Newark, Tx.
    Posts
    1,303
    I work at a GMC dealer in service and the 6.0 gets alot worse gas mileage. Its just my opinion, but I would never have a 6.0 over a 5.7. I even have customers that would sacrifice a little power to get the mileage of a 5.3 or 5.7.
    My '02 Formula has gotten 26.8 mpg on the highway. Yes, I know thats in a lighter car and 6 speed, but I bet a 6.0 in an F-body would not get that.
    '92 GMC reg. cab, step side. 7.32@ 92.3. SOLD
    http://videos.streetfire.net/video/d...d700c6401f.htm
    New project: '00 S-10 ext. cab, ZQ8, 370, T-56, daily driver.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    11,038
    Also take in consideration, how much power are you planning to make and what kind of power adders are you adding to it. The LS1 can take tons of abuse and additional power, but some of the boosted guys seem to lean towards the stronger iron 6L.
    Most of use will never see 700hp, and I'm sure the ls1 will take it all and then some.
    I say the ls1, it's lighter and it will handle anything we can throw at it.

    Gas: I think I'm getting a little less mpg now that I've installed my stall and injectors. I don't think the injectors have anything to do with it, becuase you still have to keep the same a/f ratio, they are just not working as hard. I think the stall affected my mileage about 2-4mpg, but to be honest I can't seem to stay out of it. It seems everyday I'm hitting 100mph and shortening the life of my tires, lol

    keep us updated,

    allen

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Orange Park, FL
    Posts
    46
    anyone have any clue how much heavier a 6.0L would be than a Aluminum LS1?
    2000 5.3L A4
    Fuddle 2800 + CF 100 jet + HP Tuners
    ETstreets + Dual cut outs + KP 4 link

    http://memimage.cardomain.net/member.../496250_63.jpg

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    San Antonio TX
    Posts
    118
    Originally posted by SportSide 5.3@Jan 9 2004, 02:35 PM
    anyone have any clue how much heavier a 6.0L would be than a Aluminum LS1?
    I know from a SBC to BBC it's around 180lbs. I would think it's gotta be, around 100-150lb. differents with an LS1. And that's on the front wheels where you don't need it. And I've seen three F-body cars with over 700hp and the blocks hold up, BUT I don't know how long. LOL

    I'd go with and ls1 with ls6 heads, good cam and mild porting-- you'd be over 430hp at least..

    Then or a radix!!!!!! Just my
    2003 RCSB 4.8L 5speed, BLACK
    3.42, AIRAID, loudmouth exhaust
    Nelson Performace Tune
    2000 vett cam
    160* stat
    et 14.80@94mph

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts