+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Can you believe this S&^T

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bakersville, NC
    Posts
    608

    Can you believe this S&^T

    E-mail sent to me buy Summit Racing.

    Dear Fellow Enthusiast,

    Last month, we sent you an Urgent Legislative Alert from The Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA) regarding a proposed “Cash for Clunkers” bill that would threaten our hobby. Thanks to your overwhelming response, this legislation was dropped from the economic stimulus package. Congratulations for standing up for your rights as enthusiasts!

    We have just received a follow-up Legislative Alert from SEMA. New legislation (S. 247 and H.R. 520) has been introduced in Congress to create a national vehicle scrappage program which will give U.S. tax dollars to consumers who turn-in their “gas guzzlers” to have them crushed. This program would target vehicles with low fuel economy ratings of any model year. That means sports cars, SUVs, and performance-built vehicles could be crushed in exchange for a monetary reward.

    The following information is directly from SEMA. If you would like to contact the lawmaker, follow the instructions in the alert.


    Thank you for your time,

    Your Friends at Summit Racing Equipment





    Our effort to prevent Congress from including a nationwide “Cash for Clunkers” program in the economic stimulus package has been successful – so far. Thousands of SEMA members and SEMA Action Network (SAN) enthusiasts contacted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in opposition to the plan. The Speaker’s Office informed us that your emails, calls and faxes were received and, thanks to your work, Cash for Clunkers was not included in the economic stimulus package introduced in mid-January in the House of Representatives. Unfortunately, new legislation (S. 247 and H.R. 520) has been introduced in Congress to create a national vehicle scrappage program which will give U.S. tax dollars to consumers who turn-in their “gas guzzlers” to have them crushed. Lawmakers need to scrap this idea!

    Contact Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) Immediately
    to Oppose S. 247 and H.R. 520

    The so-called “Accelerated Retirement of Inefficient Vehicles Act” is Cash for Clunkers with a twist. Instead of focusing exclusively on older cars, this program would target vehicles with low fuel economy ratings of any model year. Participants would receive cash vouchers ranging from $2,500 to $4,500 based on the model year and whether the replacement vehicle was a more fuel-efficient new car or used car (MY 2004 or later). Fuel-efficient is defined as getting at least 25 percent better mileage for the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) target for its class. The bill sponsors want to scrap up to one million cars a year for at least four years.

    There is no evidence that the program would achieve the goal of boosting new car sales or increasing fuel mileage. Many states have considered scrappage programs in the past as a way to help clean the air or increase mpg, but abandoned the effort because they simply don’t work. The programs are not cost-effective and do not achieve verifiable air quality or fuel economy benefits, but they do have a devastating impact on the many small businesses that market products and services for the scrapped cars.

    Don’t Delay! Please contact Senator Diane Feinstein and Rep. Henry Waxman today to urge their opposition to S. 247 and H.R. 520. For those who responded to our first call for action, we need you again, along with everyone else.

    Contact Sen. Dianne Feinstein to oppose S. 247
    Click here to send an email: http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/i...tactUs.EmailMe
    Call: (202) 224-3841
    Fax: (202) 228-3954

    Contact Henry Waxman to oppose HR 520
    Click here to send an email: http://energycommerce.house.gov/inde...=1313&Itemid=1
    Call: (202) 225-2927
    Fax: (202) 225-2525


    Talking Points
    Oppose the Use of U.S. Taxpayer Dollars for Accelerated Vehicle Retirement

    I am writing to urge lawmakers not to approve an “accelerated vehicle retirement” program. Even on a voluntary basis, the program will hurt thousands of independent repair shops, auto restorers, customizers and their customers across the country that depend on the used car market. These businesses are already very vulnerable in the weak economy.

    An accelerated vehicle retirement program is flawed since it does not target the “gross polluter,” an improperly maintained vehicle of any make or model year that has poor fuel mileage and dramatically more emissions due to poor maintenance.

    An accelerated vehicle retirement program is flawed because it does not factor-in how many miles-a-year the collected vehicles are currently being driven. U.S. taxpayers will be buying rarely-driven second and third vehicles that have minimal impact on overall fuel economy and air pollution.

    Accelerated vehicle retirement won’t generate many new car sales. The cash incentive provided will not be enough to enable a person to buy a new or used vehicle.

    Accelerated vehicle retirement will compete with nonprofits that rely on vehicle donations to raise funds, such as the Salvation Army, the Purple Heart and other charities.

    Accelerated vehicle retirement threatens to disrupt a large and complex industry which already handles scrappage, repair, remanufacturing and recycling issues. This independent industry provides thousands of American jobs and generates millions of dollars in local, state and federal tax revenues.

    Accelerated vehicle retirement ignores better policy options. Taxpayer dollars would be better spent as direct tax incentives to purchase a fuel-efficient new or used car, without a government vehicle crushing program. Congress should also provide tax incentives to upgrade, repair and maintain existing cars, trucks and SUVs. There are many commercially available products and technologies that can substantially improve fuel mileage and lower the emissions.

    We hope we can count on you to reject “Accelerated Vehicle Retirement.” Thank you for your consideration on this very important matter.
    If you choose to send a note and/or message to Sen. Feinstein and Rep. Waxman please forward a copy of your message to:
    E-mail: briand@sema.org
    David,
    2003 GMC Sierra Denali, LQ4, AWD, AWS, 4.10, Wheatley 93 tune, LT headers, GMPP CAI, BBK 80mm TB, MSD wires, E3 plugs, 160* T-stat, Flowmonster DI/DO, cutouts. Working on 4.8 heads, just purchased Comp 228R cam, 918 Springs, TI retainers, 7.4 hardend pushrods,

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    9,578
    Damn Democrats...

    2000 ECSB 6.0L
    TORQUER V2 CAM ● COMP 918's ● 7.4 HARDENED PUSHRODS ● K&N SERIES 77 CAI ● 80mm BBK ●PACESETTER LT HEADERS AND 3'' ORY ● SUPER 40 FLOW ● 3000 STALL ● 4.10s ● BUILT 80e ● VORTEC PERFORMANCE TUNE ● MSD 8.5mm PLUG WIRES● ELEC. CUTOUT ● UD & ALT PULLEYS ● FLEX-A-LITE E-FANS ● 22" CENTERLINE STINGRAY III's ● LUND FIBERGLASS TONNEAU ● 2" LEVELING SHACKLES ● 12K HID LOWS & FOGS ● LEDs ● DEBADGED ● WHITE-FACED ESCALADE GAUGES ● KICKER 450.1 ● 2-CVR 10's ● DS60's ● K693's

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    THE MEAN STREETS OF OKLAHOMA
    Posts
    11,120
    thats way to much reading
    THEY CALL ME G.

    AZRAEL

    2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
    2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
    2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
    2023 300S 5.7
    2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]

    The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    5,979
    Quote Originally Posted by LamboDoNoMo View Post
    thats way to much reading
    I agree!
    But I kinda get the jist of it....damn those Dems to hell...they hink they know what they are doing..
    T-RAV
    99 GMC | 5.3 | Skinny White Guy Tuned

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    bothell wa
    Posts
    38
    im going to feed my big PIG's until the day i die
    2000 rcsb z71. Bought it from my dad, the original owner! 100k on the clock. corvette servo. soon to be tuned!!

    1990 2wd rcsb. stepside. lowered 2 and 4. cowl hood. molded roll pan. 89 BMW recaro leather seats, dakota digital guage cluster. LT1 swap: ported and polished 96 corvette heads, LT4 hotcam kit, pcmforless tune, nv3500 5speed, corporate 14 bolt rear with spool and 4:11 gearing.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    College Station, TX
    Posts
    2,193
    They can try and take my truck away from me, or Ill lift my truck again and crush theirs myself
    2012 F-250 XLT/FX4 RCLB 6.7 Powerstroke
    H&S XRT Pro Race(550hp/1100tq)/ 4" flopro exhaust/H&S EGT kit/SPE Full diff unlock/S&B CAI/H&S motorsports upcharge pipe kit/ DPF,CAT,EGR,UREA Deleted/Icon 3.5" Lift-Vs 2.0 shocks/PMF DSS w' Bilstein 5100s/Icon Adj Track Bar-upgraded steel bearing/RIGID LEDs/Kenwood DNX570HD w/idatalink maestro/Hertz5x7s/Memphis 12" slim/500.1 JL slash amp/Recon f250 led emblems

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    College Station, TX
    Posts
    1,464
    thats right damnit!!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    College Station, TX
    Posts
    2,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Aggie View Post
    They can try and take my truck away from me, or Ill lift my truck again and crush theirs myself
    TWICE....

















    2012 F-250 XLT/FX4 RCLB 6.7 Powerstroke
    H&S XRT Pro Race(550hp/1100tq)/ 4" flopro exhaust/H&S EGT kit/SPE Full diff unlock/S&B CAI/H&S motorsports upcharge pipe kit/ DPF,CAT,EGR,UREA Deleted/Icon 3.5" Lift-Vs 2.0 shocks/PMF DSS w' Bilstein 5100s/Icon Adj Track Bar-upgraded steel bearing/RIGID LEDs/Kenwood DNX570HD w/idatalink maestro/Hertz5x7s/Memphis 12" slim/500.1 JL slash amp/Recon f250 led emblems

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    322
    So if it were to pass.. this is voluntary right?? I mean it keep saying mandatory. That would be f**ked up! I mean saying I were to just bought a brand new truck or something with a v8, and they take it from me, and only give me 5k I'd kill someone!

    I think they are trying to get us to just

    And kiss my a$$ while you're down there kk!

    But think about it.. that could be a reason to just put you ls whatever into a smaller truck.. Colorado anyone?! just be sure to buy it with a 4 banger first.. that should fix that s**t
    Last edited by mnc2fan; 01-29-2009 at 02:41 AM.
    - Waiting for an lq9 swap - Super 40 center in dual out - battery swap to spare tire location - exhaust turndown -

    2

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    look at it this way. limo's arent gas mileage vehicles, military vehicles are gas mileage vehicles, armor'd trucks arent gas mileage vehicles. if they did this the president and his clan would be riding around in a armor'd PRIUS. it doesnt have enough power to haul itself around rather alone bodyarmor....and that goes for the rest of things.

    its another scare tactic
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts