+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: LQ4 or LQ9?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,053
    Whats the difference between the two and which one is better to build. Im thinking of doing the 5.3 to 6L swap within the next couple of months and was wondering which one to go with.

    Thanks, Cody
    2007 CCSB Z71 VortecMax: Stock!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Mukilteo, Wa.
    Posts
    387
    The LQ9 is in the Escalades and has a bit more power to them, they also have aluminum heads, where-as the LQ4 has Iron heads I believe.
    '05 Tahoe 2WD 5.3
    Performance Mods: Nelson tune, 4" Volant Exhaust, Dynatech Full Header system, Volant Cold Air Intake, TB Bypass, 305/50R20 Eagle GT IIs
    Appearance Mods: 20x8.5 American Racing Torq-Thrust STs, Billet Emblem, Black Chrome Speed Grille, Removed running boards, door guards, fender caps and badges, and Silverstar lowbeams and fogs
    Cardomain Page> Click

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    188
    The lq9 has a higher compression ratio using flat top pistons. Although some people say their lq4 engines had flat top pistons also???
    2003 Arrival Blue Silverado SS.....I just can't leave $hit alone.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    665
    If your are going to boost the motor you might want to consider the lower compression model LQ4. It will take to boost a little better.
    No more trucks, but this is what I used to have. 2000 GMC Sierra, 6.0L-LQ4, Built 4L60, LS6 Cam, The Other Guys Headers, 3 inch exhaust and 7 chamber flowmaster, 43lb injectors, Nelson Tuning, Drop - 3/4 McGaughys Spindles, Bell Tech Shackles & Hangers. Best time 13.59 @ 106

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,053
    most likely when i get the motor i will do a cam swap and replace the rest of the valvetrain and get an sts system with a hundred or so shot of nitrous which one would you pick?
    2007 CCSB Z71 VortecMax: Stock!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Marcos Texas
    Posts
    4,393
    Originally posted by 1slow01z71@Mar 9 2005, 06:15 PM
    most likely when i get the motor i will do a cam swap and replace the rest of the valvetrain and get an sts system with a hundred or so shot of nitrous which one would you pick?
    LQ4!
    2006 Superior Blue Trailblazer SS AWD, Stock as a rock

    Sold: 2002 GMC Sportside Denali front end with a 2002 LS1, FLT level 5, Yank 2600, Trick Turbo, T76, Nelson intercooler, 60LB injectors, Warbro fuel pump, Eaton locker, Magnaflow, 3.42, Nelson Performance Tuning (speed density).

    Sold: 1981 GMC LB RC 1500 2002 4.8L 4L60E 12 bolt 3.73 Richmond Lock Right AC PS Nelson Performance tuning

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,053
    Having aluminum heads doesnt that make it harder for the engine to detonate i have heard that somewhere and that it makes the engine run cooler.
    2007 CCSB Z71 VortecMax: Stock!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mansfield, Texas, USA
    Posts
    2,462
    Yeah, if you're going to boost.. the 4 is a better motor.

    The 9 has stronger rods, full floating pins, different coating on the piston, flat tops, and well that's about all I can think of. It's a great N/A motor, what I'm gonna pick up.
    The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions. - Confucius

    "He who asks of life nothing but the improvement of his own nature, is less liable than anyone else to miss and waste life."- Henri Frederic Amiel

    '01 Chev Z71 LT - '85 BMW 745i TURBO - '88 BMW 750iL - '88 Ford F150 XLT Lariat - '79 MB 240D - '79 MB 280S Euro
    '80 MB 380SE-5.0 Euro - '85 MB 300SD - '87 MB 300SDL - 1990 MB 300SEL - '91 MB 300SE - '91 MB 560SEL

    Let's face it, the red hair... makes 'em wet.


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Marcos Texas
    Posts
    4,393
    Originally posted by 1slow01z71@Mar 9 2005, 06:25 PM
    Having aluminum heads doesnt that make it harder for the engine to detonate i have heard that somewhere and that it makes the engine run cooler.
    I haven't heard of that maybe others can chime in! I know there are alot of iron headed turbo rigs out there. I think it is all head and combustion port design that makes all the difference.
    2006 Superior Blue Trailblazer SS AWD, Stock as a rock

    Sold: 2002 GMC Sportside Denali front end with a 2002 LS1, FLT level 5, Yank 2600, Trick Turbo, T76, Nelson intercooler, 60LB injectors, Warbro fuel pump, Eaton locker, Magnaflow, 3.42, Nelson Performance Tuning (speed density).

    Sold: 1981 GMC LB RC 1500 2002 4.8L 4L60E 12 bolt 3.73 Richmond Lock Right AC PS Nelson Performance tuning

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,053
    Hitman X i have been trying to get ahold of you to get some tranny parts but apparently my email thinks your email has a disease or something email and maybe i can get your phone number or something so we can get in touch.
    2007 CCSB Z71 VortecMax: Stock!

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts