+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 40

Thread: Ls6, fast, edelbrock ect...

  1. #1
    ff_jeff Guest

    Ls6, fast, edelbrock ect...

    Does anyone have a dyno of before and after an intake swap? I looked and cant find anything on here.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,031
    I Think The Ls6 Intake Gained Like 8 Hp But Lost Torque.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Austin Tx.
    Posts
    13,138
    Try pt.net jeff. I think there was something on there
    1951 3100
    1984 C10

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by ff_jeff View Post
    Does anyone have a dyno of before and after an intake swap? I looked and cant find anything on here.
    ls6 is proven 15rwhp over a ls1 intake
    fast 90 is proven 20 over ls6
    ported 90 is proven 8 over unported


    now truck vs ls6 has been debated where it hasnt seen any gains to some
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  5. #5
    ff_jeff Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Quik View Post
    ls6 is proven 15rwhp over a ls1 intake
    fast 90 is proven 20 over ls6
    ported 90 is proven 8 over unported


    now truck vs ls6 has been debated where it hasnt seen any gains to some
    Yeah, thats what I'm getting at because the truck intake flows better than the ls1 according to gm. But the LS6 isn't that different flow wise than a truck.
    But nobody has concrete before and after dyno's here or there on any intake. I have seen plenty of dyno sheets with numbers but none of just an intake.
    Some try and test at the track, only to run an 1/8th mile... which will show mostly nothing.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    12,078
    Aren't the 01-02 F cars equipped with the LS6 intake? Maybe I got my years messed up but I thought the newer F cars were different than the 98-99 or 2000 F cars.

  7. #7
    ff_jeff Guest
    ls2, and ls6 ect had the different intakes. I think your about right on the years.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    I think the fbody/ybody LS1 engines had one style from 97 to mid year 2001 and then they switched all the LS1/LS6 engines to the flat floor LS6 intake. LS2 intake is totally different, many report losing HP running the LS2 intake on a 5.7L and smaller engine since it was designed for use on a 6L engine.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  9. #9
    Ls6 would notbe worth the time and money involved to upgrade. The LS2 maybe. I doubt it but maybe. If you are talking about adding any of these to your 4.8 .. . .well who knows.
    99RCSB Broke because I wasted thousands and thousands of dollars on my truck.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by zeake View Post
    Ls6 would notbe worth the time and money involved to upgrade. The LS2 maybe. I doubt it but maybe. If you are talking about adding any of these to your 4.8 .. . .well who knows.

    Oh wait ... Quik might.
    99RCSB Broke because I wasted thousands and thousands of dollars on my truck.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts