+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: LM7 5.3L Top End Compatability with a LS2 6.0L Short Block

  1. #1

    LM7 5.3L Top End Compatability with a LS2 6.0L Short Block

    Greetings, just discovered LS1Truck.com and digg it already! I have 03 Chev 5.3 LM7 in a shortbed reg cab and recently purchased a LS2 6.0 shortblock. After reading forums and talking with the local GM dealer I still have no clear answer to:

    Will the top end of a LM7 5.3 bolt up to the shortblock of a LS2 6.0?

    Without going into lengthy explaination of why; the blending of the two engines would be a temporary solution to a $$ money planning problem.

    Thanks in advance ... -Toby

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Spring, TX
    Posts
    2,228
    all cathedral port heads will bolt to the 6.0. 6.0, 5.3, and 4.8 intake manifolds are the same.
    Last edited by cjriojas; 08-15-2010 at 02:03 AM.
    '02 Silvy: Z71 EC Step Side 5.3L Nelson tuned
    2013 GMC Acadia: SLT1 Carbon Black
    1976 Corvette Stingray: Trying to save it, progress is slow.

    ^Ricky's Sweet PS Skilz
    09/21/2010 02:31 <danger_ranger83> I'm not really worried about the looks...I want it to be fast and ugly...bc no one wants to get outrun by something ugly

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Broken Bow, OK
    Posts
    1,434
    The 862 heads from the 5.3 aren't gonna be the best thing for the LS2, but they will work. I would spend the few extra dollars to find some 243s at least.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,812
    Will the 243's work with the LS2 pistons? Won't those heads push the cr over the limit?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Spring, TX
    Posts
    2,228
    799 cast heads came on the Ls2 which are pretty much 243's.
    '02 Silvy: Z71 EC Step Side 5.3L Nelson tuned
    2013 GMC Acadia: SLT1 Carbon Black
    1976 Corvette Stingray: Trying to save it, progress is slow.

    ^Ricky's Sweet PS Skilz
    09/21/2010 02:31 <danger_ranger83> I'm not really worried about the looks...I want it to be fast and ugly...bc no one wants to get outrun by something ugly

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Round Rock, TX
    Posts
    3,069
    799/243 heads on a LS2/LQ9 put you at 10.9:1 compression. No where near pump gas limits. Don't waste your time with those junky 5.3 heads on the bigger bore motor.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lancaster Ca
    Posts
    41
    The 5.3 heads have even smaller chambers than the 243's. Not sure what it would bring you up to but I'm sure its past the limit of pump gas.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,033
    Quote Originally Posted by bowtietommy View Post
    The 5.3 heads have even smaller chambers than the 243's. Not sure what it would bring you up to but I'm sure its past the limit of pump gas.
    NO its NOT i ran 706 castings heavily ported heads, if i remember correctly the cr was just over 12:1 it put down just over 400 on my lq9
    Simple: 408 on steroids!
    single digits coming soon!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lancaster Ca
    Posts
    41
    12:1 sounds pretty high to me without a big cam to bring down the dynamic compression. But if it worked for you that's good to know. Also I might be wrong about this but I thought the LS2's had a domed piston and the LQ9's were a flat top

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Broken Bow, OK
    Posts
    1,434
    Quote Originally Posted by bowtietommy View Post
    12:1 sounds pretty high to me without a big cam to bring down the dynamic compression. But if it worked for you that's good to know. Also I might be wrong about this but I thought the LS2's had a domed piston and the LQ9's were a flat top
    LS2 and LQ9 have flat tops, LQ4 has dished

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts