38rwhp for the cam and L92 heads?? That'll work!!Originally Posted by skeet
heres a comparison dyno the red ( 402 rwhp) is when i had ported 706 5.3 heads..
the blue line is from a head and cam swap
38rwhp for the cam and L92 heads?? That'll work!!heres a comparison dyno the red ( 402 rwhp) is when i had ported 706 5.3 heads..
the blue line is from a head and cam swap
06' Silverado RCSB 5.3L 4wd..
PERFORMANCE: Cam, Springs, Pushrods, P&P heads & 3 angle valve job, Injectors, PS LT's & ORY, Nelson Tune, Catback, CAI, Comp Cam Double Timing Chain, HP Oil Pump, UD Pullies, ARP bolts, Stall, TBS, 4.10's, Iridium NGK's, G-80, 160 t-stat, HD-2 & Vette Servo, 46,000 tranny cooler, 75-125hp shot of funny Gas..
HID's Hi, Lows & Fogs
Waiting to be installed: LC-1 WB & Standalone system
you're missing the real story on that Dyno graph.
I would love to see the "avg. hp" difference in those two graphs.
I bets its a LOT more than a 38hp gain.
Avg. HP matters a lot more than Peak HP
2002 Tahoe 4.8 - soon to be turbo'd - SOLD
1989 Mustang - LX Vert - 351W-TT - 2inches of dust covering it
2012 Raptor - 497rwhp at 10psi
If you aint breaking - you aint going fast enough
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote