+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: 6.2L Battle

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    LaPlace, Louisiana
    Posts
    405

    6.2L Battle

    http://www.truckinweb.com/tech/1205t...a/viewall.html

    Didn't read the entire thing, so IDK if they posted 1/4 mile times, but they should, as well as before and after times..
    Run your motor, not your mouth..

    04 ECSB 5.3 Sierra: 14.6@95
    Pacesetter Headers, Intake, Tune

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    San Antonio TX
    Posts
    1,150
    Read it the other day. All they posted were hp/trq #. Their suppossed to run them on the next months issue.


    4.8, TSP 220, 6L90 swap, 3400 Stall, 4.10s w/30" drag radial and T76 @ 16lbs.
    Best ET 11.54@114 w 1.52 60ft
    Raceweight 4905 lbs.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    S.A. Texas
    Posts
    3,751
    it was a good article just got it in the last one. I have to say for what it is the Ferd is pretty bad ass. A mid travel 4x4 with a S/C'd 6.2 would be fun.
    Name: Mark,
    God created turbo lag so nitrous trucks could have a chance.


    http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post274877

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Crowder, OK
    Posts
    8,005
    I think if the GM was tuned with HPT or EFI live it would have been much closer.

    1969 Chevy RCLB C10 350/TH400 SOLD
    2007 Chevy RCSB 4.8 4x4 LS SOLD
    2008 Chevy RCSB 5.3 4x4 LT SOLD
    2010 Chevy CCSB 6.2 4x4 LT SOLD
    2005 GMC CCLB DRW 6.6 Duramax 4x4 191,000 and counting
    2013 FORD CCSB F350 6.7 Powerstroke 4x4


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,031
    should of put a turbo on the gm instead lol....i bet you the chevy/gmc still runs faster

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Arizona/Utah
    Posts
    3,939
    I think I saw something that said the SC units are very limited on the 6.2 due to the valve train dod/vvt crap.
    ECSB 2kSierra 2wd 4.8L-K&N-HPtuners-Calspeed LT's-Magnaflow-Tahoe20's-HankookRH06

    waiting to go in... 3.90s, 214/220cam

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    THE MEAN STREETS OF OKLAHOMA
    Posts
    11,120
    Quote Originally Posted by pl4yboy View Post
    I think if the GM was tuned with HPT or EFI live it would have been much closer.
    we need a captain obvious sign.

    THEY CALL ME G.

    AZRAEL

    2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
    2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
    2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
    2023 300S 5.7
    2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]

    The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Scott, Arkansas
    Posts
    424
    Quote Originally Posted by kerrige View Post
    I think I saw something that said the SC units are very limited on the 6.2 due to the valve train dod/vvt crap.
    This...they wake up the Fords really well but not the GMs.
    2005 Silverado SS AWD
    AEM CAI, ARH LTs, HD-2 shift kit with vette servo, Circle D 278mm 3200 stall Madtunesracing.com street tune (MTR now has a Dynojet 248 chassis dyno)

    13.82 @ 94.92 w/1.83 60'

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts