the dope shizz thread

On bags???? BAD A.

But the dual exhaust ruins it. It should be tucked up underneath. :twocents:

Way to quote all the pictures that were a post before yours Travis... Sweet car though!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by txarkitekt

On bags???? BAD A.

But the dual exhaust ruins it. It should be tucked up underneath. :twocents:

---

what you say is true

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Duct_tape123

Way to quote all the pictures that were a post before yours Travis... Sweet car though!

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bangbangskeetskeet

I knew that it was more than just a pretty car! I wouldn't mind driving it even if it does have a ford motor in it. :lol:

---

I made a post with my quote of all them pics. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by txarkitekt

On bags???? BAD A.

But the dual exhaust ruins it. It should be tucked up underneath. :twocents:

---

no way!! a car like that needs a pair of flamethrowers!

i like Travis Barker's Cadillac
http://blog.cardomain.com/2009/06/19...1966-cadillac/
http://i48.tinypic.com/2holnx1.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gordo

http://i48.tinypic.com/2holnx1.jpg

---

:bow:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by txarkitekt

On bags???? BAD A.

But the dual exhaust ruins it. It should be tucked up underneath. :twocents:

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by straightaxle

no way!! a car like that needs a pair of flamethrowers!

---

agreed. nothing is cooler than a car/truck that lays frame and has a full exhaust. Plus, a sick Linc like that needs to shoot flames.

Tim Duncan's camaro:

Tim Duncan Camaro pictures from camaros photos on webshots

That camaro was here in Austin at the hot rod show a couple weekends back. Evidently he has some guy drive it for him because he had a game