The TR224 is a good one but I would go with that comp if it were me,but I would go bigger just cause I like alittle more lope to it!
Printable View
The TR224 is a good one but I would go with that comp if it were me,but I would go bigger just cause I like alittle more lope to it!
i have a 220/220 114 here im probably gonna put in, but I may do a custom 218/222 with high lift on 114lsa for my truck.
choices choices lol
Ah hell, I was really considering the TR224 112 But I have an 99 EC/SB Im reading its a no no with the Extended Cab go with the TR220? Anyone here running the TR224 in a EC? I have my eye on a TCI 3000 stall but might have to go a while on stock. Point me in the right direction guys.
hey Tyson, did ya get my tune?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(chrisj6 @ Feb 20 2006, 08:54 AM) [snapback]44910[/snapback]</div>Yea man I didnt get a chance to try some stuff out untill today. Was at the race yesterday and well I was in no condition to drive when I got home lol. You really did a nice job on your tune. Your Octane Table is well put together and the best I tried so far, It was very responsice and pulled throught the power band at 28-30 Deg WOT with no knock what so ever. I was however seeing like 60 Deg of Advance on decell, Mabey it was just learn time. Really all of your spark tables seemed to have helped alot. I didnt get much further than this, But I see alot of good stuff in here. We really went the same way with our tunes but I was alittle conservative like on the adders and I missed a few things on disabling my EGR and other areas. Im off tomarrow so I'll play with some other things then. Might pick your brain along the way. Good stuff :hshake:Quote:
hey Tyson, did ya get my tune?
[/b]
Just when this was getting fun again. I ordered the new cam this morning. I went with the TR220 112. Oh well...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(chrisj6 @ Feb 20 2006, 08:54 AM) [snapback]44910[/snapback]</div>Oh yea what are you doing with the LC tabels? I dont want to name names, But I had someone working on this for me. Was able to on F-bodies but I kinda gave up on him. Something you know that I dont??Quote:
hey Tyson, did ya get my tune?
[/b]
ummmmmmmmm....LC? no comment. lol email me
oh and on the 60*, i actually lowered that so it would be smoothed, your getting some kind of adder kicking in.........mine only hits like 58* max, but that low of a load on decel its fine. I told you they were aggressive lol! I know the table commands lower, so I'm not sure whats goin on! I did lean out the PE, that helps some on how hard it pulls.
Chris
btw how did it idle, i have an updated tune with another RAF pass made for in gear. They should be lined up now.
Chris
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(chrisj6 @ Feb 21 2006, 12:14 AM) [snapback]44998[/snapback]</div>Could be on my side. I only copyed some of your spark tables. I didnt do a full rewrite, Seems to act up when I do that. I notice at the end of my log it settles to 52-54 deg. The idle is nice, It didnt shoot up as high as my old tune on a cold start and def smoother.Quote:
ummmmmmmmm....LC? no comment. lol email me
oh and on the 60*, i actually lowered that so it would be smoothed, your getting some kind of adder kicking in.........mine only hits like 58* max, but that low of a load on decel its fine. I told you they were aggressive lol! I know the table commands lower, so I'm not sure whats goin on! I did lean out the PE, that helps some on how hard it pulls.
Chris
btw how did it idle, i have an updated tune with another RAF pass made for in gear. They should be lined up now.
Chris
[/b]
Im going to shoot you an email on the :nono: lol. I never quit understood why its such a taboo thing myself. I mean we can run open loop, run any AFR we choose pretty much do anything we choose. BUT dont talk about lean cruise!
Theres a way around the actual tables, i'll let ya know!