If you do in fact run that cam, you'll need to upgrade your valve springs and pushrods. Stock rocker arms will work fine but whatever you do, don't neglect your valve train when you're making power.
Printable View
If you do in fact run that cam, you'll need to upgrade your valve springs and pushrods. Stock rocker arms will work fine but whatever you do, don't neglect your valve train when you're making power.
i think thats way to big for a 4.8
i wouldnt go any bigger then a 222 224 or somewhere around that with a 4.8.
It'll sound pretty damn good
and at least he'll never be able to say he picked too small of a cam. Gotta look at the plus sides fellas.Quote:
Originally Posted by sleeper1500
why waste the time and money putting it in when everyone is telling you its too big?Quote:
Originally Posted by 1 bad blazer
whos gonna do the tuning for that cam?
i say go for it!!! throw it in there, rev the motor to 7k+ and see how she runs!! :rock:
you dont got the cubes in a 4.8 to make big torque, so rev the piss out of it to make up for it...
going with nelson ,flaco or wheatly still haven't decided on a one .
iv had a 228 cam in a 4.8 with a 3200 stall and it still did pull till 5k. that cams gonna take forever to start pulling.
Im sorry but how in the world did this even come up?
good luck to the poor bastard that not only tunes that thing but also thinks its gonna make any kinda usable power..
that cam belongs in a 346+cui motor..