Originally Posted by
Madd Maxx
Fair enough. I just wanted to make sure that forum members realize that, yes, there was a problem with some of the 918 springs, but that Comp handled it quickly and to the satisfaction of their customers. They are a quality company with outstanding customer service.
While I agree the PRC springs are a quality product with a very good price, I would consider dual springs to be a little overkill for the OP's modest cam choice. Those specs appear to be the Vinci Ultra Torque grind (made by Crane). That cam's power curve is pretty much done by 6000 RPM, so it doesn't need the extra valvetrain stability that dual springs would provide. So the price he would pay for being able to rev higher with a cam that won't, or for having a little added protection if one spring were to break, is a constant HP loss. Higher spring pressure increases pumping losses - it takes HP to compress the springs.
Plus, the ovate, beehive springs solve a problem that round, constant-diameter springs have - resonance at various RPM points. That resonance also costs HP and can be seen on some dyno plots.
Sorry for the long diatribe, but selecting performance parts is not like increasing HP - a little more is good, a lot more is way better, and too much is just right. There is a lot of engineering behind valve spring design and selecting the right spring is important for optimizing output.